Here is a shot of each candidate’s facial expressions at a
point in the debate when Romney was speaking. This juxtaposition is highly indicative of how the audience
perceived each candidate, regardless of what
they said. To watch the debate in
full (or just a portion of it), click here.
This past Wednesday marked the first Presidential debate
between President Barack Obama and former Governor Mitt Romney. Held in Denver, Colorado, and moderated
by Jim Lehrer of the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), this debate focused on
domestic issues, specifically the economy, healthcare, the role of government,
and governing. Each candidate’s
purpose was to convince undecided American voters to vote for them, and it is
fascinating how diction, tone, facial expressions, and body language influenced
the audience’s perception of the candidates. Both candidates effectively used ethos, pathos, logos, and
anecdotes to appeal to the average American. However, throughout the debate, President Obama did not make
eye contact with Romney and often wore an expression of boredom and
superiority. Though he effectively
substantiated his plans for America, he distanced himself from the audience through
his explanatory tone. Overall, I
do not think his purpose was fulfilled because his negative body language
undermined many of his statements.
In addition, Obama did not challenge Romney, while Romney consistently questioned
Obama’s claims. Romney effectively
appealed to and engaged with the audience through his ardent tone of
voice. Although he grimaced
painfully most of the time Obama was speaking, and was unable to give specifics
about his own policies, he seemed passionate and confident about his plans. I feel that this positively influenced
the audience in his favor, and that Romney was able to accomplish his purpose. It will be interesting to note how the
rhetorical strategies of each candidate may change in upcoming debates.
No comments:
Post a Comment