The New York Times article "What Should Children Read?", by Sara Mosle, in Wordle format. Click on the picture to zoom in.
Teacher, author, and New
York Times contributor Sara Mosle presents an interesting and relevant
controversy in her New
York Times opinion piece as she
questions what children should be reading. To the chagrin of many people who see the value of fictional
works and poetry, contemporary English curricula are shifting in focus towards
nonfiction reading (much like our 11th grade AP English curriculum)
as part of the Common Core State Standards. These national standards have been adopted by the majority of
states. Mosle uses the opinions of
qualified educators to support both sides of the controversy (ethos),
incorporating their opinions through quotes. She also effectively uses anecdotes to support some of the
arguments, illustrating why the change might be necessary. All of the arguments then culminate in
one conclusion that Mosle further supports: the idea that students need not more, but better nonfiction, which can be found in the form of “narrative
nonfiction”. By providing examples
of sources that contain narrative nonfiction, and even providing direct links
to some sources in her article, Mosle effectively reaches out to her
audience. The audience seems mostly
to be American parents and/or educators who are interested in the evolution of
English curricula. I think the
piece could be even more effective if the article was directed towards
students, who will be directly impacted by this new curriculum. Even so, I think the piece does fulfill
its purpose of conveying some of the controversy surrounding the development of
a core English curriculum.
No comments:
Post a Comment